A digital service from FCT Publication
ACTIVIDADE DE ANGIOLOGIA E CIRURGIA VASCULAR NO PERÍODO DE CONFINAMENTO DEVIDO À PANDEMIA COVID-19 — HOSPITAL DA SENHORA DA OLIVEIRA, GUIMARÃES
| Summary: | Introduction: Ever since the first positive case was identified on March 2nd in Lousada, a region close to the border of our catchment area, we reacted immediately by systematically repurposing our surgical wards. Objective: Describe the changed made by our Vascular Surgery Department from March 13 to May 14. Methods: We collected clinical, operative, and consultation volume data from March 13 to May 14 and we compared it with the historical averages. We also reviewed the documents related to the planification activity. Results: At the peak of the outbreak, we adopted a split-team policy and encouraged complete team segregation to reduce the risk of intradepartmental cross-contamination. Non-ambulatory surgical volume decreased by 54.8% (from 31 cases to 14 cases), and the ambulatory surgical activity was cancelled. Our in-person consultation volume decreased 86.4%; 73 consultations were completed by phone, in which the patient was never evaluated in-person. In the emergency room the main difference between the pre-pandemic to the pandemic was in the number of patients observed without vascular pathology (82 versus 28). Conclusions: The adaptation to COVID-19 pandemic reduced significantly the surgical production of our Vascular Surgery Department. |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Vascular Surgery Department SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic Departamento de Cirurgia Vascular Pandemia |
| Country: | Portugal |
| Document type: | journal article |
| Associated institution: | Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular |
| Language: | English |
| Origin: | Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular |
| Summary: | Introduction: Ever since the first positive case was identified on March 2nd in Lousada, a region close to the border of our catchment area, we reacted immediately by systematically repurposing our surgical wards. Objective: Describe the changed made by our Vascular Surgery Department from March 13 to May 14. Methods: We collected clinical, operative, and consultation volume data from March 13 to May 14 and we compared it with the historical averages. We also reviewed the documents related to the planification activity. Results: At the peak of the outbreak, we adopted a split-team policy and encouraged complete team segregation to reduce the risk of intradepartmental cross-contamination. Non-ambulatory surgical volume decreased by 54.8% (from 31 cases to 14 cases), and the ambulatory surgical activity was cancelled. Our in-person consultation volume decreased 86.4%; 73 consultations were completed by phone, in which the patient was never evaluated in-person. In the emergency room the main difference between the pre-pandemic to the pandemic was in the number of patients observed without vascular pathology (82 versus 28). Conclusions: The adaptation to COVID-19 pandemic reduced significantly the surgical production of our Vascular Surgery Department. |
|---|