Um serviço digital da FCT Publicação
Contingência e ciência divina no comentário de Marcos Jorge a Peri Hermenias I, 9
| Resumo: | Pedro Luis (1538-1602) was a Valencian Jesuit that succeeded Molina as the professor of the chair of Prima at the University of Évora. Although he was extremely influential, his works remain unpublished and were ignored after his death. The preparation of the publication of De incarnatione, his commentary on the Tertia pars of Summa theologiae, brought him many difficulties and was a source of institutional problems, both within his order and with the Portuguese Inquisition. The unrest of his fellows around the publication of this treatise shows that it may contain novelties and controversial theses. With this paper, I aim at providing a first survey of Pedro Luis's two redactions of a commentary on Tertia pars. I will highlight especially the importance of the divine knowledge of the future contingents for his discussion on the relationship between sin and Incarnation. |
|---|---|
| País: | Portugal |
| Tipo de documento: | journal article |
| Tipo de acesso: | Aberto |
| Instituição associada: | Repositório Aberto da Universidade do Porto |
| Idioma: | português |
| Origem: | Repositório Aberto da Universidade do Porto |
| Resumo: | Pedro Luis (1538-1602) was a Valencian Jesuit that succeeded Molina as the professor of the chair of Prima at the University of Évora. Although he was extremely influential, his works remain unpublished and were ignored after his death. The preparation of the publication of De incarnatione, his commentary on the Tertia pars of Summa theologiae, brought him many difficulties and was a source of institutional problems, both within his order and with the Portuguese Inquisition. The unrest of his fellows around the publication of this treatise shows that it may contain novelties and controversial theses. With this paper, I aim at providing a first survey of Pedro Luis's two redactions of a commentary on Tertia pars. I will highlight especially the importance of the divine knowledge of the future contingents for his discussion on the relationship between sin and Incarnation. |
|---|