Um serviço digital da FCT Publicação
Planeamento Civil de Emergência. Abordagem integrada
| Resumo: | The Civil Emergency Planning (CEP) has its origins in World War I in a Civil Defence perspective, aimed at protecting civilians from the intense air strikes, especially through actions related to the protection of civilians in shelters and with health support. Since the end of the Cold War, civil protection was born as a form of support to the civilian population, due to the end of a military threat and increased technological and natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, and accidents in the transport area. It has so evolved, and the protection of the civilian population was seen as an important task not only in war situations, but also in crisis situations and began to be directed essentially to resolve disruption of social order, or disasters resulting from natural or technological disasters, situations that only occur in unusual ways, result in scenarios with unpredictable consequences and destructive power. In this work it was raised the following central question "What is the organizational model to be developed for the Civil Emergency Planning?". We intend to show that the model, which through integrated planning, better enables a permanent interaction between all entities that may potentially be related to the CEP, to contribute to a more resilient society in situations of crisis or war. The methodology adopted had a first part of clarification of the state of the art related to the theme in question, and in the second half interviewing a sample of entities from different areas of society. The results confirm the necessity of the existence of the PCE as a planning mechanism, prepared to articulate resources that are complementary to the primary response entities. It thus came to the conclusion that it would be important to create a planning and a situation monitoring structure, with multidisciplinary areas, on the level of the Prime Minister's Office, if possible co-located with the cabinet. |
|---|---|
| Autores: | Gomes, Artur |
| Assunto: | Planning Catástrofe Catastrophe Crise Integrated Complementaridade Integrado Crisis Guerra Planeamento War Emergency Complementarity Emergência |
| Ano: | 2018 |
| País: | Portugal |
| Tipo de documento: | dissertação de mestrado |
| Identificadores: | ID: 201871963 |
| Tipo de acesso: | Aberto |
| Instituição associada: | Repositório Comum, Repositório Comum, Instituto Superior de Educação e Ciências, Repositório Comum, Instituto Superior de Ciências Educativas |
| Código do projeto financiado: | 201871963 |
| Idioma: | português |
| Origem: | Repositório Comum |
| Resumo: | The Civil Emergency Planning (CEP) has its origins in World War I in a Civil Defence perspective, aimed at protecting civilians from the intense air strikes, especially through actions related to the protection of civilians in shelters and with health support. Since the end of the Cold War, civil protection was born as a form of support to the civilian population, due to the end of a military threat and increased technological and natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, and accidents in the transport area. It has so evolved, and the protection of the civilian population was seen as an important task not only in war situations, but also in crisis situations and began to be directed essentially to resolve disruption of social order, or disasters resulting from natural or technological disasters, situations that only occur in unusual ways, result in scenarios with unpredictable consequences and destructive power. In this work it was raised the following central question "What is the organizational model to be developed for the Civil Emergency Planning?". We intend to show that the model, which through integrated planning, better enables a permanent interaction between all entities that may potentially be related to the CEP, to contribute to a more resilient society in situations of crisis or war. The methodology adopted had a first part of clarification of the state of the art related to the theme in question, and in the second half interviewing a sample of entities from different areas of society. The results confirm the necessity of the existence of the PCE as a planning mechanism, prepared to articulate resources that are complementary to the primary response entities. It thus came to the conclusion that it would be important to create a planning and a situation monitoring structure, with multidisciplinary areas, on the level of the Prime Minister's Office, if possible co-located with the cabinet. |
|---|